Writer's Block: Sweat it out
Feb. 18th, 2011 07:16 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
[Error: unknown template qotd]
Yes. Unless a student has a valid excuse not to do PE, of course they should do it. Obesity and related disorders are obviously a huge problem these days in Western society; making PE unmandatory will not help people's laziness! I had a valid excuse to get out of PE for the last few years where I had to do it, but otherwise, I would do it. Yes, it was not a good experience most of the time, and I dreaded it, but I was pleasantly surprised how much I enjoyed some of the sports. If kids never try sports, how will they know they like them?
We can't condemn obesity and the fact that people's lifestyles directly cause diseases like type 2 diabetes, and have made cardiovascular disease the biggest cause of death, and then say, no it's fine; you can skip PE if you want to. Plus, I think that every subject should be mandatory until later years of school. At my old school, all the bratty children objected to taking a foreign language, which was mandatory - the teachers bowed and let them have their own way... :/ Who's running the school?! (A girl I took English class with actually cried to get out science class... they let her drop the subjects.)
Finally, though I'm on a slight tangent, why do people of religions like Jehovah's Witnesses get out of Religious Education? It's not a class that forces you to become a Christian - in fact, it teaches you about all the main world religions. And the atheists still have to attend! I hate to generalize, but a lot of religionists are close-minded about other religions, and this "I refuse to learn about other religions that aren't my own" attitude helps nothing. The class doesn't force you into any religion - it's about education, so that always annoyed me. God says not to worship other gods, but he doesn't condemn learning about them and keeping an open mind of others' beliefs.
Yes. Unless a student has a valid excuse not to do PE, of course they should do it. Obesity and related disorders are obviously a huge problem these days in Western society; making PE unmandatory will not help people's laziness! I had a valid excuse to get out of PE for the last few years where I had to do it, but otherwise, I would do it. Yes, it was not a good experience most of the time, and I dreaded it, but I was pleasantly surprised how much I enjoyed some of the sports. If kids never try sports, how will they know they like them?
We can't condemn obesity and the fact that people's lifestyles directly cause diseases like type 2 diabetes, and have made cardiovascular disease the biggest cause of death, and then say, no it's fine; you can skip PE if you want to. Plus, I think that every subject should be mandatory until later years of school. At my old school, all the bratty children objected to taking a foreign language, which was mandatory - the teachers bowed and let them have their own way... :/ Who's running the school?! (A girl I took English class with actually cried to get out science class... they let her drop the subjects.)
Finally, though I'm on a slight tangent, why do people of religions like Jehovah's Witnesses get out of Religious Education? It's not a class that forces you to become a Christian - in fact, it teaches you about all the main world religions. And the atheists still have to attend! I hate to generalize, but a lot of religionists are close-minded about other religions, and this "I refuse to learn about other religions that aren't my own" attitude helps nothing. The class doesn't force you into any religion - it's about education, so that always annoyed me. God says not to worship other gods, but he doesn't condemn learning about them and keeping an open mind of others' beliefs.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-18 10:35 pm (UTC)A girl I took English class with actually cried to get out science class... they let her drop the subjects
Are you kidding me? Seriously????
God says not to worship other gods, but he doesn't condemn learning about them and keeping an open mind of others' beliefs.
Exactly! I agree!
no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 02:09 pm (UTC)Yes. She cried her way out. Apparently I was told she turns on the waterworks for absolutely everything. The worst part is that the teachers actually let her drop it. WTF?
no subject
Date: 2011-02-18 10:38 pm (UTC)In my junior high, our religion class was entirely geared towards Christianity, only giving lip service to some other religions. To be fair, it was a Roman Catholic school at the time. In high school they offered a World religons course, but I wasn't interested. It wasn't until I entered university and discovered our wonderful Religious Studies program that I realised how wonderful and amazing religions can be.
I have a hard time understanding why people just don't want to learn everything they can about everything that's available to them. But I guess I'm biased because I'm so voracious in my learning. If I could do every degree that my university offered, I probably would. :p
no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 02:13 pm (UTC)Yeah, I think if students go to a Roman Catholic school, there's the thought that they are Catholic or at least interested in Catholicism, so it makes sense it's geared toward Christianity. I still think it's very restricting for religious schools not to show the whole picture, but I guess they don't want half their students converting to Islam and still attending the school?! I don't know. :) All I know is that my school was as unreligious as they come, and actually, while RE taught us about world religions, many of the lessons were to do with morals, and ethical debates. Which everyone needs to know about regardless of religion!
I'm the same. :D When I was a kid, I always said I wanted to go to uni or college over and over again and get hundreds of degrees :D
no subject
Date: 2011-02-22 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-18 10:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 02:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 07:42 am (UTC)With that, a girl in high school refused to disect a worm in biology because she didn't agree with animals being used for science. 1) It's a WORM 2) Thanks to animals we have a better understanding of medicines and products that help us. I'm not saying it's right, but jeeeze get over it. She had to disect an online worm... lol!
Haha, it's easy to get off on a slight tangent when talking about stuff like this! Sorry xo
no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 02:19 pm (UTC)Hmm. I think animal dissection is different. I do think she was overreacting over a worm, but then I think that people shouldn't have to do animal work if they don't have to. I know a guy at uni who is Muslim, and he applied to do a work placement that may involve animal work. Of course he says in the interview that he wouldn't do it, and he was refused the job. Now, that's silly of him to apply for it if he didn't agree with it. But in school you have no choice really. But yes, it's the principle that in schools as soon as a kid's like "Nooooo, I don't want to", the supposed authority is like "O.k. then!"
Tangents are o.k.! Normally I don't mind; it's just that I make my Writer's Block posts public, but hey, people don't have to read my tangents if they don't want to. :)
no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 12:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 02:24 pm (UTC)In secondary school, there was no need for it. Number one, Jehovah IS God! Two, our RE class was mostly focused on moral and ethical issues, so even Jehovah's Witnesses need to know about that. (Especially because they refuse blood transfusions and stuff :/) Plus, it seems a bit like brainwashing to me that they're not even allowed to HEAR about other religions. No wonder people generalize religionists as close-minded.